Press Releases

Why Paperpal-Written Text May Be Flagged by AI Detectors (And Why That’s Not the End of the World)

Seeing your own writing flagged by AI detectors as “AI-written” can be unsettling, especially when you know the ideas, arguments, and analysis are entirely your own. For many students and researchers, the AI score raises a bigger question than the number itself: what does this actually mean?  

AI detectors often flag original work re-written using an AI tool as “AI-generated” because they evaluate writing style, not the source of ideas. When you use an AI academic writing assistant like Paperpal, your writing becomes more polished, consistent, and predictable — qualities that mirror statistical patterns many AI models produce. AI detectors recognize these patterns and automatically label the text as AI-written, even when the ideas and/or input content is fully your own. 

Below is a practical explanation of why this happens, why it matters, and why a high AI score isn’t as concerning as it may appear. 

AI Detectors Look for Patterns, Not Ideas

AI text detectors majorly rely on two metrics to define “AI-likeness” of a piece of text: 

  • Perplexity: how predictable the wording is
  • Burstiness: how much sentence length varies

AI-generated text tends to be smooth, consistent, and predictable. Revisions using AI tools, by design, also improve fluency and make your writing more consistent. AI detectors interpret this as “AI-like,” even when you have written the entire draft yourself. 

Most AI checkers judge surface style, not intellectual ownership. AI content detectors cannot identify: 

  • originality of ideas
  • independent reasoning
  • whether AI was only used for grammar or clarity

Why Paperpal-Rewritten Text Can Be Flagged by AI Detectors

AI detection of texts where both humans and AI contribute depends on how much the AI output differs from the original input. For example, if you give the AI prompts like “fix grammar” or “make it more fluent,” the changes are usually small. The output closely resembles your original text, so AI detectors may not flag it strongly. 

However, if the AI is asked to “expand this thought” or say if original pointers are given and the AI is asked to convert into sentences, it rewrites the text more extensively. AI Detectors then may identify this as AI-generated, because they analyze the final text itself, not the originality of the underlying ideas or the human input that led to it. Even if the core ideas were entirely yours, AI-generated rewording can trigger a detection score, since AI content detectors assess the output text, not the creative process behind it. 
 
This is why AI detection scores are not definitive. They only indicate how much the text resembles typical AI-generated patterns. Human nuance, originality, and reasoning can only be assessed through human review. Top publishers and universities are increasingly realizing this and have started accepting AI-assisted writing to refine language, express research, and ensure clarity with the expectation that authors maintain full intellectual control and ownership. 

The best practice is transparency: explain where and how AI was used, what prompts guided the rewriting, and which parts were your own work. The AI detection score is just an indicator of AI involvement in writing text, not a measure of whether the ideas or intellectual content are yours.  

Here are some simple illustrative examples using Paperpal that show you how AI-assisted rewriting interacts with AI detection.  

Scenario 1: Minor AI assistance for textual changes (grammar, improving fluency, improving/changing the tone, etc.) 

Original human input: “Climate change affects agriculture by reducing crop yields and threatening farmer livelihoods. To ensure food security, farmers need to adopt adaptive strategies.” 

Paperpal AI prompt: “Improve Fluency”  

AI detection likelihood: Low to Medium. Here, the text was changed slightly by the AI to enhance flow, but the sentences, structure, and ideas are almost entirely yours. 

Scenario 2: Moderate AI assistance (summarize, expand, explain, etc.) 

Original human input: Based on existing pointers/ideas, Paperpal AI is asked to expand text using a custom prompt. 

Paperpal AI Output: “This delay in technological adoption exacerbates existing agricultural challenges, hindering productivity improvements and sustainable practices. In India, where agriculture plays a crucial role in the economy and food security, the slow integration of new technologies can lead to: 
1. Reduced crop yields and quality 

2. Inefficient use of resources (water, fertilizers, pesticides) 
3. Increased vulnerability to climate change and extreme weather events” 

AI detection likelihood: Medium to High. In the example above, the original idea is expanded and sentences are phrased differently, so AI text detectors are likely to notice AI influence, even though this is based on your own core ideas. 

Being Flagged by AI Checkers Doesn’t Mean Your Work Isn’t Original

One of the most common frustrations academic writers express is having their original work flagged by AI detectors. You may wonder, “If my ideas are original, why does the style matter?”  

The short answer: style shouldn’t matter; but current AI detection tools can’t see your ideas, only how your sentences are framed.  

AI detectors cannot assess academic integrity and human effort. They are designed to evaluate linguistic uniformity. That’s why: 

  • a brilliant, original essay can get a “98% AI” score
  • a shallow, human-written essay can get a “0% AI” score
  • a non-native writer’s work can be falsely flagged due to simpler phrasing

To put it simply: a high AI detection score is not an accusation, it’s a technical artifact of how polished or predictable your academic writing appears. 

Why Universities (and Publishers) Use AI Detectors

Universities and academic institutions use AI detectors because they want to discourage: 

  • fully AI-written submissions based on the original ideas
  • assignments produced by AI, without any human inputs
  • fabricated citations or unsupported claims

At the same time, many institutions also recognize that these AI detection tools are not perfect. While guidelines on AI use are still evolving, in most cases: 

  • instructors use AI detection scores are a starting point, not a verdict
  • students are encouraged to explain their research and writing workflow
  • authorities recognize that false positives are common and often resolved by reviewing drafts

The goal is to nurture learning and protect academic honesty, not to punish legitimate language editing. 

Is It Ethical to Use AI Tools like Paperpal for Academic Writing?

Yes, when used responsibly. Major academic publishers (such as Elsevier and Wiley) permit the use of AI tools for language editing, ensuring clarity, and improving readability, as long as certain principles are followed: 

  • You retain full ownership of the ideas, arguments, and analysis.
  • You carefully review and take responsibility for all AI-assisted edits.
  • You disclose substantive rewriting or content generation when required by journal or institutional policies.

These guidelines reflect a clear distinction between language support and intellectual contribution. Basic grammar corrections, spelling fixes, and minor stylistic improvements are generally treated like traditional copyediting and typically do not require disclosure. 

Paperpal’s position is simple: AI detection is important for academic integrity, but it must be interpreted carefully. AI writing tools like Paperpal are designed to support clear, high-quality writing, not replace reasoning or authorship.  

When authors own their ideas, document their process, and use AI responsibly, a high AI detection score becomes a technical signal to review, not a mark of wrongdoing. In short: 

  • AI detection is a useful first lens, not a final verdict.
  • AI detectors are fallible; false positives can happen.
  • AI-edited academic writing can look “AI-like.”
  • Human evaluation ultimately determines integrity.

When used correctly, AI detection promotes trust and AI writing tools promote clarity. Together, the two are complementary parts of modern academic writing. 

The Bottom Line on AI Detection and Academic Integrity

Using AI tools like Paperpal for writing, rewriting, and editing can make text appear polished and consistent, core characteristics of strong academic writing that may resemble patterns AI detectors are trained to flag. This is exactly why Paperpal’s AI Detector is built differently. Rather than relying on binary judgments, it provides a transparent, contextual view of how AI may have influenced writing. With sentence-level insights and a three-band categorization, it offers clarity, not accusation, and reflects how today’s academics are using AI to draft, revise, and refine their work. 

While Paperpal-written content may still be flagged by some AI checkers, the results should be carefully reviewed before final submission. Academic integrity is ultimately shaped by responsible writing practices: owning your ideas, maintaining a version history, revisiting text to restore your authentic voice, and disclosing AI use when required; this empowers academics to navigate an increasingly hybrid AI–human future with confidence. 

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 23+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster. 

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$25 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed. 

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free! 

Riddhi Shah

Recent Posts

Why Paperpal Built Its Academic AI Detector (And Why Binary Scores Don’t Tell the Full Story)

For the longest time, we at Paperpal didn’t want to build an AI detector. Reducing complex human…

4 days ago

Research Paper Appendix | Examples and Format

A research paper appendix is an often underappreciated element of the submission package. The appendix in a research paper typically contains…

1 week ago

How to Do Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research

People frequently share their thoughts and experiences through various channels, including interviews, surveys, reviews, social media posts,…

1 week ago

Top 7 Plagiarism Checkers for Essays in 2026 (Tested & Compared)

If you're a student writing essays and need to check for plagiarism before submission, you…

2 weeks ago

Paperpal Launches Its AI Detector: The Smarter Way to Achieve Clear, Confident Writing

AI detectors and AI detection have become an unavoidable part of academic writing today. Universities are using it, journals are experimenting with it,…

2 weeks ago

Best Paraphrasing Tool for Essays and Research Papers [2026 Updated]

Choosing the best paraphrasing tool for academic writing can be challenging, especially when many of…

2 weeks ago