What is a Meta-Analysis? How to Conduct it (with Examples) 

11

Meta-analysis has become a vital tool in modern research, helping scientists look beyond individual studies to uncover meaningful trends across large sets of data. Unlike traditional reviews, it combines results from multiple studies using statistical methods, producing more reliable estimates and revealing patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed. In this article, we will explore what meta-analysis is, how it differs from systematic reviews, and its role in research. We will also cover the process of conducting one, its main approaches and characteristics, practical examples, and the key advantages and limitations, particularly in fields like medicine and public health. 

What is Meta-Analysis? 

Meta-analysis is a statistical method used to quantitatively synthesize results from multiple independent studies that address the same research question, producing a pooled estimate of effect.¹ It applies formal statistical techniques to combine effect sizes, increase precision, and reduce random error inherent in individual studies. Meta-analysis is especially valuable when primary studies are small, underpowered, or report inconsistent findings. 

Key characteristics of meta-analysis: 

• Usually done as part of a systematic review, following a clear and transparent process. 
• Converts results from different studies into a common measure so they can be compared. 
• Uses statistical models to combine findings and account for differences between studies. 
• Looks at variation across studies (heterogeneity) to understand why results might differ. 
• Can examine subgroups or other factors to explain differences in outcomes. 
• Often shows results visually, for example, with forest plots, to make interpretation easier. 

Because meta-analyses involve complex methods and extensive reporting, researchers often rely on tools like Paperpal to ensure clarity, consistency, and journal-ready academic language throughout the manuscript

What is the Purpose of Conducting a Meta-Analysis? 

The purpose of a meta-analysis can be captured under the following closely related but distinct objectives:² 

1. Clarifying overall significance in fragmented evidence 
   When individual studies report mixed or inconclusive findings, meta-analysis brings the evidence together to determine whether an effect is statistically supported across the broader body of research. 

2. Refining estimates of effect size 
   Rather than relying on single-study results, meta-analysis produces a pooled estimate that better reflects the true magnitude and direction of an effect, with improved precision. 

3. Assessing benefits alongside harms and safety outcomes 
   By aggregating data across studies, meta-analysis allows a more balanced evaluation of positive outcomes and potential risks, including adverse effects that are too infrequent to be detected reliably in individual studies. 

4. Identifying subgroup patterns and sources of variation 
   Meta-analysis makes it possible to examine how effects differ across populations, contexts, or study characteristics, revealing patterns that may not reach statistical significance in smaller, standalone studies. 

These aims explain why meta-analysis is widely used to strengthen conclusions and support evidence-informed decisions when individual studies provide only partial answers. 

What is the Difference Between Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review? 

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are closely related research methods, but they serve distinct purposes and differ in how evidence is synthesized and presented. 

	Systematic Review	Meta-Analysis
Definition	Structured, transparent process used to identify, appraise, and synthesize all relevant studies addressing a specific research question.	Statistical technique used to quantitatively combine results from multiple studies addressing the same question.
Primary Aim	Provide a comprehensive and unbiased overview of existing evidence.	Calculate a pooled effect size that summarizes the overall magnitude and direction of an effect.
Type of Synthesis	Can be qualitative (narrative) and/or quantitative.	Quantitative.
Data Requirements	Include heterogeneous studies, including qualitative and observational research.	Requires comparable quantitative outcomes that can be statistically combined.
Use of Statistics	May include descriptive statistics but does not require statistical pooling.	Uses statistical models (e.g., fixed-effect or random-effects) to combine effect sizes.
Outcome	Structured summary of findings, study quality, methods, gaps, and inconsistencies in the literature.	Single summary estimate (e.g., mean difference, odds ratio) with confidence intervals and measures of heterogeneity.
Relationship Between the Two	Can stand alone without a meta-analysis.	Typically conducted within a systematic review, if data permit.
Example in Engineering Education	Examining how project-based learning is implemented across engineering programs, comparing contexts, assessment methods, and reported learning outcomes.	Analysis combining effect sizes from multiple studies to estimate the overall impact of project-based learning on engineering students’ problem-solving or conceptual understanding.

Put simply, systematic reviews offer a solid, structured approach to gathering evidence, and meta-analyses build on this by providing quantitative summaries across studies when possible. 

You Might Like Reading: What is a Systematic Review? Definition, Steps, and Examples 

When is a Meta-Analysis Appropriate? 

A meta-analysis is appropriate when the following conditions are met.² 

1. A clear and focused research question: The included studies address the same underlying question, with comparable populations, interventions or exposures, comparators, and outcomes. Conceptual clarity is essential before statistical pooling is considered. 

2. An adequate body of comparable studies: Multiple independent studies investigate the same effect or association, and are sufficiently similar in design, populations, and outcome definitions to justify combining their results. 

3. Compatible quantitative data: Studies report outcomes in a quantitative form that allows effect sizes to be calculated or transformed into a common metric (e.g., odds ratios, risk ratios, or mean differences). 

4. Systematic and transparent study selection: Meta-analysis is conducted within a systematic review framework, using predefined inclusion criteria, comprehensive literature searches, and reproducible data extraction methods to minimize bias. 

5. Acceptable and interpretable heterogeneity: Some variation across studies is expected and can be assessed statistically and explored analytically. Meta-analysis is appropriate when heterogeneity reflects random or explainable differences rather than fundamental incompatibility among studies. 

6. Clear added value of pooling results: Combining studies improves statistical power, resolves inconsistent findings, or allows exploration of overall trends and modifiers that individual studies cannot adequately address on their own. 

If studies are too heterogeneous or data are insufficient, a narrative synthesis is generally more appropriate. 

How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis (Step by Step) 

Meta-analysis involves a systematic process to combine evidence across studies. The steps can be grouped into five main themes:¹ 

1. Planning & Preparation

• Define Research Question: Formulate a focused and precise question or hypothesis to guide the review. 
• Develop Protocol: Prepare a detailed protocol specifying objectives, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and methods for transparency. 
• Set Eligibility Criteria: Decide which study designs, populations, outcomes, and timeframes will be considered. 

At this stage, clearly articulating the research question and protocol is critical, and Paperpal can help refine wording while maintaining academic precision.

2. Literature Search & Study Selection 

• Systematic Search: Search multiple databases with clear keywords and Boolean operators; include manual searches of references. 
• Screen Studies: Review titles, abstracts, and full texts against eligibility criteria. 
• Document Selection: Keep a transparent record of inclusion/exclusion decisions for reproducibility. 

 3. Data Collection & Quality Assessment 

• Extract Data: Gather study characteristics, sample sizes, outcome measures, and effect statistics in a structured format. 
• Assess Study Quality: Evaluate methodological rigor and risk of bias using standardized tools. 
• Standardize Effect Measures: Convert outcomes into comparable metrics (e.g., Cohen’s d, odds ratios). 

4. Data Synthesis & Analysis 

• Statistical Pooling: Combine effect sizes using fixed- or random-effects models. 
• Assess Heterogeneity: Quantify variability between studies and explore its sources (e.g., subgroup or sensitivity analyses). 
• Check Publication Bias: Use funnel plots or statistical tests to detect selective reporting. 

5. Interpretation & Reporting 

• Interpret Results: Discuss findings in the context of theory, evidence quality, and practical significance. 
• Visualize Findings: Use forest plots or summary tables to present results clearly. 
• Report Transparently: Describe methods, limitations, and implications to ensure reproducibility and credibility. 

During manuscript preparation, Paperpal’s pre-submission checks and language suggestions help enhance clarity, improve flow, and align the paper with journal writing standards.

Examples of Meta-Analysis 

Here, for example, we illustrate how meta-analysis has been applied in STEM and engineering education to evaluate the effectiveness of different teaching approaches. 

Example 1: Assessing Project-Based Learning in Engineering Courses 

Background: In engineering education, project-based learning (PBL) is widely adopted to develop critical thinking and collaboration skills, with many studies evaluating its impact in varied academic settings.  Meta-Analysis Process:  – Selecting Studies: Identify PBL interventions with measurable outcomes such as exam performance, team collaboration, or project completion rates.  – Extracting Data: Collect sample sizes, effect sizes, and details about the PBL format and duration.  – Combining Results: Calculate a summary effect size across studies, considering heterogeneity between different PBL implementations.  – Assessing Robustness: Conduct sensitivity analyses to see if results vary by course level or student population.  – Findings: Overall evidence indicates that PBL enhances student engagement and hands-on learning, with outcomes varying based on course design and available support.

Example 2: Investigating Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Engineering Skills 

Background: Engineering courses are making greater use of simulation tools, with researchers examining their impact on learning, retention, and confidence.    Meta-Analysis Process:  – Selecting Studies: Include research comparing simulation-based instruction with traditional lectures or lab sessions.  – Extracting Data: Record sample characteristics, learning outcomes, and effect sizes.  – Synthesizing Results: Pool effect sizes using meta-analytic models, accounting for differences in simulation types and assessment methods.  – Bias Assessment: Examine publication bias and methodological quality to ensure reliability of findings.  – Findings: Compared with conventional classrooms, simulation-based learning is often linked to improved skill proficiency and increased student confidence, encouraging its adoption in engineering education.

Advantages of Meta-Analysis 

Meta-analysis offers several key advantages that make it a valuable tool in research synthesis. 

• Increased statistical power and precision: Pooling data from multiple studies increases sample size and reduces random error, providing more accurate effect estimates. 
• Objective, quantitative synthesis: Provides a structured, less subjective summary of research findings compared with narrative reviews. 
• Generalizability of findings: Combining results across diverse populations and settings extends the applicability of conclusions. 
• Resolution of conflicting results: Helps clarify inconsistent findings across studies and identify overall trends. 
• Trend and pattern identification: Reveals underlying trends and influences that single studies often fail to detect. 
• Efficient evidence summarization: Pulls scattered research findings into a concise form that supports informed decisions. 
• Guidance for future research: Highlights gaps in knowledge and informs the design of new studies or hypotheses. 

These benefits make meta-analysis a powerful tool for producing reliable, interpretable, and broadly applicable research evidence. 

Disadvantages of Meta-Analysis 

While meta-analysis strengthens evidence synthesis, it has several limitations that can affect validity and interpretation. 

• Quality of included studies: A meta-analysis cannot fix weak studies. If the original research is poorly designed or biased, the combined results may be unreliable. 
• Heterogeneity and comparability: Substantial differences in study populations, interventions, outcomes, or methodologies may limit comparability and make statistical pooling inappropriate or misleading. 

• Bias and incomplete evidence: Publication bias, selective outcome reporting, and incomplete literature searches can lead to overestimation of effects and skewed conclusions. 

• Methodological and statistical constraints: Decisions regarding inclusion criteria, choice of effect measures, statistical models, or reliance on a limited number of studies can influence results. 

• Limits to interpretation: Meta-analysis does not establish causality. Moreover, post-hoc or subgroup analyses should be interpreted cautiously to avoid spurious associations. 

These limitations highlight the need for careful planning, transparent reporting, and cautious interpretation to ensure robust and meaningful findings. 

Meta-Analysis Dos and Don’ts 

Meta-analysis is a powerful tool to synthesize research, but its value depends on careful planning and execution. The table below outlines practical tips for designing a meta-analysis, selecting appropriate analytical methods, and evaluating heterogeneity across studies. 

Dos	Don’ts
Develop and register a clear, prospective protocol defining objectives, eligibility criteria, and analytical methods.	Do not conduct post-hoc analyses or modify inclusion criteria based on study results.
Use a comprehensive and reproducible search strategy to identify all relevant studies.	Avoid selective study inclusion or incomplete reporting of the search process.
Assess risk of bias and methodological quality using validated tools.	Do not pool results without considering study quality and internal validity.
Select appropriate effect measures and statistical models (fixed- or random-effects) based on heterogeneity and study design.	Do not combine studies that are clinically or methodologically incompatible.
Quantify and explore heterogeneity and perform sensitivity or subgroup analyses where appropriate.	Avoid ignoring substantial heterogeneity or presenting pooled estimates without qualification.
Evaluate and report potential publication bias and interpret findings in light of evidence limitations.	Do not overstate conclusions beyond what the aggregated data can reasonably support.

Key Takeaways 

• What it is: Meta-analysis looks at multiple studies on the same topic and combines their results to give a clearer picture. 
• Why it matters: It helps spot trends, resolves conflicting findings, and gives stronger evidence than any single study alone. 
• What to watch out for: The results are only as good as the studies included; poor quality or biased studies can skew the conclusions. 
• How it works: Researchers use statistical models to pull data together and measure overall effects. 
• The payoff: When done right, meta-analysis is a powerful tool for making smarter decisions in research, policy, or practice. 

Frequently Asked Questions 

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 23+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster. 

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$25 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed. 

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free! 

References 

1. Zaccagnini, M., & Li, J. (2023). How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis: a guide for clinicians. Respiratory Care, 68(9), 1295-1308. 

2. Møller, A. M., & Myles, P. S. (2016). What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis?. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 117(4), 428-430.