What Are AI Hallucinations: Types, Causes, and How to Avoid Them in Academic Writing

AI hallucination is inevitable. You’ve probably experienced it yourself when using AI for academic writing: you ask AI to summarize a paper or answer a technical query, and it responds with something that sounds brilliant. Confident tone, precise phrasing, even citations that look perfectly formatted. But look closer, and you realize that some of the studies cited don’t actually exist. 

Such errors can slip into your drafts, leading to misinformation and serious academic credibility risks. As scholars increasingly turn to AI for research paper writing, it has become critical to understand what AI hallucinations are, why they occur, and how to incorporate AI into your work responsibly. 

What are AI Hallucinations? 

AI hallucinations occur when large language models (LLMs) produce content that seems credible but are actually false, misleading, distorted, or entirely fabricated. These can range from minor errors, such as an incorrect date, to serious fabrications like non-existent citations. A study published in the Canadian Psychological Association’s Mind Pad showed that ChatGPT actually uses real researcher names, authentic-sounding journal titles, and correctly formatted DOIs. This made it tricky to spot citation errors, increasing the chances of unverified AI content slipping into your work unnoticed—a risk too high for academic contexts. Top AI companies like ChatGPT have disclaimers about potential inaccuracies in their outputs, warning users to check and verify important information. 

But how common is the problem of AI hallucinations? A 2024 study on the frequency of AI hallucinations by ChatGPT found that out of 178 references generated, 28 references could not be found and 69 references were not Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs). However, this one study cannot be taken as the whole truth. While LLMs can produce incorrect information, it’s difficult to predict the frequency of such errors. AI hallucination rates depend on the model being used, the domain in question (e.g., healthcare), and task complexity (e.g., multi-step prompts).  

AI Hallucination in Academic Writing 

In academic settings, such AI hallucinations are particularly harmful, as they can distort evidence, propagate misinformation, and undermine academic integrity. The table below highlights the most common types of AI hallucinations that can sneak into research and writing tasks. 

At first glance, the examples provided above may seem minor but, in academia, even small inaccuracies can lead to plagiarism flags, retraction risks, or research credibility loss. With more students and researchers incorporating AI into their workflows, it becomes important to understand what causes these errors.  

So, Why Do AI Hallucinations Happen? 

1. Gaps and bias in training data 

AI models are only as good as the data they are trained on. When that data is incomplete, biased, or contradictory the algorithm “fills in the blanks,” which may lead to AI hallucinations. For instance, if a model is trained primarily on Western academic texts, it may fail to include key perspectives from underrepresented regions or disciplines, reinforcing cultural blind spots in research. Alarmingly, to stay consistent with fabricated content, AI can actually continue generating incorrect information in subsequent responses, creating a “snowball effect” when it comes to AI hallucinations.  

2. No real-world understanding 

Unlike humans, AI doesn’t actually “know” or “experience” things so it does not have a real cognitive process. Generative AI works by predicting the most likely next word based on patterns, expressions, or concepts included in its training data, which often sounds correct but can be completely wrong or outdated. Most AI systems also struggle with nuance and context, resulting in AI research assistants misinterpreting and providing literal or nonsensical outputs for prompts that involve sarcasm, irony, cultural references, or interdisciplinary terms. 

3. Limitations of AI design; no fact checks 

Generative AI technology is not built to separate fact from fiction. Even more advanced models like ChatGPT-5 don’t possess a built-in fact-checking mechanism. That being said, the way algorithms are designed to be predictive, AI could still produce incorrect insights even if it was trained solely on accurate data. Essentially, generative AI outputs remain vulnerable to subtle but significant errors. 

How to Minimize AI Hallucinations in Your Work 

If you are using AI in your academic workflows, here are five best practices to help you minimize AI hallucinations and use tools responsibly to deliver your best original work.  

1. Verify before you trust: Always double-check AI-generated facts, data, and citations against peer-reviewed sources, trusted academic databases, and credible platforms. Remember to treat AI as a research assistant, and not as the final authority. 

2. Give clear, structured prompts 
   The quality of generative AI outputs depends on how good your prompt writing is. Don’t leave instructions open-ended; clearer and more specific prompts are likely to get you fewer errors.  

3. Use tools built for academia 
   Choose AI tools for research that prioritize transparency, data security, and accuracy. Platforms like Paperpal clearly label AI-assisted content and never use your data to train their models. 

4. Follow your institution’s AI policies 
   Many universities and journals now require AI disclosure in writing submissions. So be sure to review and follow your institution’s guidelines and credit AI assistance where applicable. 

5. Keep human judgment at the core 
   AI can improve clarity and efficiency, but only you can ensure accuracy and context. Don’t use it as a shortcut; AI should be used to amplify, not replace, your intellectual thinking and expertise.  

AI hallucinations highlight the gap between machine pattern recognition and human understanding. Yet they also remind us of AI’s potential when used responsibly. With verification, structured use, and ethical awareness, AI for research can empower students and researchers to write, edit, and think more efficiently, without compromising truth or originality. 

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 23+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster. 

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$25 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed. 

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!