The Hidden Risks of Using Unverified AI Content in Your Academic Writing

Artificial intelligence can be a powerful ally for academics. From generating research summaries to improving grammar and structure, AI writing tools can save time and enhance clarity when used responsibly. Two different surveys on AI use in 2025 revealed that 80% of students and researchers regularly use generative AI in their academic workflows.^1,2 

But this comes with a growing concern: when students or researchers use unverified AI outputs without oversight, they risk introducing inaccurate information, fabricated citations, and even plagiarized content into their work. This violates institutional guidelines, raises questions about research credibility, and compromises academic integrity. Let’s take a look at the fallout of not using AI the right way. 

The Academic and Ethical Risks of Using Unverified AI Content

AI Hallucinations and Spread of Misinformation

One of the most common problems with AI-generated content is the risk of hallucination, when AI models produce confident but false or biased statements. A 2024 study published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research found large language models (LLMs) fabricated or incorrectly cited a significant proportion of references in their academic output, with high hallucination rates for Google Bard (91.4%), ChatGPT-3.5 (39.6%), and ChatGPT 4 (28.6%).³ If such fake citations and misleading claims slip into your writing, it can spread misinformation across disciplines, potentially undermining the validity of published work. 

Non-Disclosure and Compromised Academic Integrity

Using AI for academic writing without properly disclosing it can be considered as research misconduct, falsification, and deceptive authorship as it raises questions about who actually did the real intellectual work.⁵ Journals and universities are tightening rules to emphasize human accountability and protect academic integrity. Most do not allow AI tools to be listed as authors, while journals like Elsevier and Springer Nature insist on AI disclosure statements to be included in the acknowledgements or methods sections to ensure research transparency. 

Plagiarism, Cheating, and Authorship Concerns

While AI technically synthesizes new content instead of copying existing content word-for-word, presenting AI-written material as your own counts as academic dishonesty. Many top universities explicitly classify the use of AI tools to write your essay or paper as a form of plagiarism; ghost writing by AI even by using prompts may be seen as cheating and academic dishonesty.⁴ Even paraphrased AI output, when used as is without human oversight and not properly disclosed, blurs the line between human and machine authorship. 

Introducing Potential Bias in Research Outcomes

AI writing tools mirror the data they’re trained on. Since much of that data comes from the open web, societal stereotypes and biases in representation, gender, and geography among others can seep into the machine generated content. Assumptions made in the algorithm’s assumptions may also naturally result in potentially biased results. If you use unverified AI writing, without any critical evaluation, your work can reinforce these biases and potentially skew academic conclusions, which can be misleading for others referring to your work in the future. Another  

Undermining Critical Thinking and Originality

Educators are worried that over-reliance on AI may limit students’ ability to engage deeply with their subjects. When general AI tools are used to provide ideas, structure, as well as phrasing, without the personal human insight or expertise, the writing feels formulaic and monotonous. The blind use of unverified AI text shows a lack of creativity, originality, independent reasoning, and intellectual depth, all critical skills in education and research.⁶ 

Data Privacy and Confidentiality Risks

Several major AI companies rely on user data to retrain their models. This means that any sensitive data or unpublished manuscripts (even sections of your writing) entered into AI writing tools could be used to train the model or be exposed to the public. Researchers and students must be extra cautious about sharing personal or private data through these platforms. Alternatively, they should choose trusted AI research assistants like Paperpal, which has strict measures and explicitly commits to not using content uploaded or processed on their platform to train their AI, ensuring your work stays secure, private, and confidential.  

How to Verify and Ethically Use AI Content

While the risks of using unverified AI in your writing are serious, using AI research assistants ethically and responsibly can enhance productivity and learning. Here’s how to do it right: 

1. Treat AI as an Assistant, Not an Authority

Think of AI as a brainstorming partner—not the final source. Use it to refine ideas, outline sections, or suggest appropriate phrasing, but never use the content as is. It is important to apply your own judgment before including AI content in academic work and ensure the final work is original, reflecting your critical thinking and reasoning skills. 

2. Always Verify Facts, Information, and Sources

Double-check every fact, statistic, or reference against reputable primary sources. A 2024 Social Media Today analysis found that most major AI tools fail to offer correct citations, often fabricating reference links, and summarizing or approximating information.⁷ This underscores the need for careful manual review.  

3. Ensure Human Oversight and Authentic Voice

After using AI writing tools to generate ideas or text, always review and rewrite this in your own words. Add your personal insights, real world examples, and unique arguments to make your research and writing stronger. This ensures that your writing retains your authentic voice and meets ethical authorship standards. 

4. Check Institutional Guidelines on Use of AI

Before using any AI academic writing tool, consult your university’s or journal’s policies on AI for research paper writing or manuscript preparation and ensure you follow them. These institutional guidelines, many of which are still evolving, will specify what level of ethical AI use is acceptable (for editing vs. content generation).  

5. Disclose AI Use Transparently in Your Work

Many journals and universities now require researchers to disclose generative AI assistance, depending on how this has been used in you writing. Check submission guidelines and use standard or tailored AI disclosure templates, when available, to declare AI use; this is mostly included in the acknowledgements or methodology section of your paper. 

The growing accessibility of AI tools for research marks a turning point in academia. By combining human expertise with ethical AI use, through verification, oversight, and disclosure, AI research and writing tools can democratize knowledge, accelerate learning, and help academics express ideas with clarity and confidence. But when used irresponsibly or as a shortcut, AI can just as easily erode the credibility that scholarship depends on. We hope this articles helps you on the path toward responsible, transparent, and authentic AI use. 

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 23+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster. 

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$25 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed. 

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free! 

References:  

1. Digital Education Council Global AI Student Survey 2024, Digital Education Council website – August 2024. Accessible on https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/digital-education-council-global-ai-student-survey-2024 

2. Zhehui L.  et al. LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers’ Usage and Perceptions. arXiv, October 2024. Accessible on https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.05025  

3. Chelli, M. et al. “Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis.” Journal Of Medical Internet Research, 2024. Accessible on https://www.jmir.org/2024/1/e53164 

4. AI Tools and Resources, University of South Florida Libraries. Accessible on https://guides.lib.usf.edu/AI/plagiarism 

5. Tang, BL. Undeclared AI-Assisted Academic Writing as a Form of Research Misconduct. CSE Science Editor, September 2025. Accessible on https://www.csescienceeditor.org/article/undeclared-ai-assisted-academic-writing-as-a-form-of-research-misconduct/ 

6. Ali, Omar. et al. The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Science Direct. Accessible on https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523007618 

7. Hutchinson, A. Report Finds AI Tools Are Not Good at Citing Accurate Sources. Social Media Today, March 2025. Accessible on https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/report-ai-tools-fail-correct-citations-queries/742236/