What is Correlational Research: Definition, Types, and Examples 

138

Patterns surround us in everyday life—when one variable changes, another often seems to follow. Noticing these patterns leads to questions about whether the two are connected. This is where correlational research design becomes especially useful, as it allows researchers to explore possible relationships between variables that occur in real-world settings. 

This study provides a clear overview of correlational research and how it is applied in practice. It starts by clearly explaining what correlational research is, then moves on to explore the different types commonly used across various fields. The study also looks at the main characteristics of correlational research, helping to show how this approach differs from experimental methods in practice. 

The study also addresses when correlational research should be used, particularly in situations where variables cannot be manipulated or where ethical and practical constraints exist. Together, these sections aim to build a solid understanding of correlational research and its relevance in academic and applied settings. 

What is Correlational Research?

Correlational research is a non-experimental research method that examines the relationship between two or more variables to find whether they are associated or correlated. This approach helps researchers to identify patterns and trends within data, without manipulating any of the variables involved.¹ While correlation can reveal useful patterns, it doesn’t prove cause and effect, so researchers need to interpret results carefully and account for other possible influences. Overall, correlational research serves as a useful tool for exploring relationships among variables in various fields, such as psychology, education, health sciences, and social sciences, helping to inform further experimental studies and theory development. 

Characteristics of Correlational Research

• Non-Experimental Nature – Correlational research does not involve manipulation of variables; researchers simply observe and measure relationships as they naturally occur.  
• Focus on Relationships – This method seeks to identify patterns and relationships between variables rather than individual variables in isolation, establishing whether they are positively, negatively, or not correlated at all. 
• No Cause-and-Effect Conclusion – While correlational research can show associations between variables, it does not imply causation. 
• Exploratory Nature – Correlational research is used to explore relationships between variables when little prior information is available. It helps researchers identify patterns and associations that can guide future studies or form the basis for experimental research. 
• Strength of Relationship – The strength and direction of relationships are quantified using correlation coefficients, which can range from -1 (perfect negative) to +1 (perfect positive). Values closer to ±1 indicate stronger relationships, while values closer to 0 indicate weaker relationships. An overview of correlation measures and their meaning is given below: 

Coefficient	Range	Meaning of values
Pearson’s r	-1 to 1	Linear relationship strength & direction
Spearman’s ρ	-1 to 1	Monotonic relationship strength & direction
Kendall’s τ	-1 to 1	Monotonic relationship strength & direction
Point-Biserial r	-1 to 1	Association between continuous & dichotomous variables
Phi coefficient φ	-1 to 1	Association between two dichotomous variables
Cramer’s V	0 to 1	Association between categorical variables (no direction)

Types of Correlational Research

Correlational research can be classified based on the direction, form, and number of variables involved. 

1. Positive, Negative, and No Correlation 

• Positive Correlation 
  A positive correlation exists when two variables change in the same direction. As one variable increases, the other also increases, and vice versa. 
  Examples: Time spent on a treadmill and calories burned. 

• Negative Correlation 
  A negative correlation occurs when two variables move in opposite directions, where an increase in one leads to a decrease in the other. 
  Examples: Price and demand. 

• No Correlation 
  In this case, the variables are unrelated. Changes in one variable do not show any consistent pattern with changes in another. 
  Example: Eye color and academic performance. 

2. Linear and Non-Linear Correlation 

• Linear Correlation 
  In linear correlation, a change in one variable leads to a constant and proportional change in another. The relationship can be represented by a straight line on a graph. 
  Examples: Height and weight; temperature and sales of ice creams. 

• Non-Linear Correlation 
  A non-linear correlation occurs when the rate of change between variables is not constant. The relationship may increase at some points and decrease at others. 
  Example: Grain production may not increase steadily with increased use of fertilizer. 

3. Simple, Multiple, and Partial Correlation 

• Simple Correlation 
  Simple correlation examines the relationship between only two variables. 
  Examples: Price and income. 

• Multiple Correlation 
  Multiple correlation studies the relationship between one variable and two or more other variables at the same time. 
  Example: Study performance in relation to sleep quality and study time. 

• Partial Correlation 
  Partial correlation measures the relationship between two variables while keeping the influence of other related variables constant. 
  Example: Studying the relationship between cotton production and rainfall while controlling factors such as sunlight and manure quality. 

These types of correlational research provide a structured way to analyze relationships, making it easier to interpret patterns and draw meaningful conclusions without claiming causation. 

When to Use Correlational Research?

Correlational research is commonly used when researchers aim to understand relationships between variables without manipulating them.² The following list highlights key environments in which correlational research is most useful: 

• When the goal is to determine whether variables are related, without establishing cause-and-effect relationships. 
• When variables must be observed in real-life environments where control or manipulation is not possible. 
• When manipulating variables would be unethical, impractical, or impossible, such as studying trauma or long-term life experiences. 
• When researchers suspect a causal relationship but cannot test it experimentally. 
• When the purpose is to identify patterns that can guide future research or help make informed predictions. 

Correlational Research Example 

Correlational research helps us uncover statistical patterns between variables without manipulating them. Here are a few examples to illustrate this kind of research: 

1. Exercise and Stress Levels 
   Ever wonder if people who exercise regularly experience lower stress? You do not assign exercise routines to participants, but you can collect data on exercise frequency and self-reported stress levels to identify any relationship between the two variables. 

2. Social Media Use and Anxiety 
   Suppose you think people who spend more time on social media might experience higher anxiety. It would be unethical and impractical to force people to spend excessive hours online. Instead, you can record participants’ daily social media usage and measure their anxiety levels to see if a statistical connection exists. 

In all these cases, correlational research helps detect meaningful trends, providing insights into how variables are linked, while keeping the study ethical and non-intrusive. 

How to Collect Correlational Research Data?

Depending on what you want to study, there are a few common ways to gather data. 

1. Surveys and Questionnaires 
One of the simplest ways to collect data is by asking people directly. Surveys let participants share information about themselves, their behaviors, or their experiences. They can be handed out online, in person, or even over the phone, and they’re great for reaching a lot of people quickly. 

2. Naturalistic Observation 
Sometimes it is best to just observe people or situations in their everyday environment to make sense of how variables interact in real life. For instance, you might notice patterns in how students participate in class or how shoppers move through a store. The key is to stay unobtrusive so your presence does not change their behavior. 

3. Archival or Existing Data 
Historical records, medical files, school performance data, or government statistics can be used to study relationships without having to start from scratch. The trade-off is that you have to work with whatever data was collected and how it was collected. 

Tips for Better Data Collection: 

• Make sure your sample represents the population you want to study. 
• Use measurement tools that are reliable and accurate. 
• Collect data on all relevant variables for each participant to properly analyze relationships later. 

How to Analyze Correlational Research?

After collecting your data, the real work begins—figuring out what the numbers are actually telling you. A good place to start is by looking at the relationship between variables using correlation or regression analysis, and sometimes both. Many researchers first sketch a scatterplot, which gives a quick, visual sense of whether the variables seem connected and if any values look unusual. 

With correlation analysis, the goal is to describe the relationship in a simple way. A correlation coefficient sums it up in one number, showing how strong the relationship is and whether the variables move in the same direction or opposite ones. Pearson’s r is often used when both variables are numerical and the relationship appears linear. While correlations are usually examined between two variables, they can also be extended to include more. 

Regression analysis comes into play when you want to go beyond seeing a relationship and start making predictions. It helps estimate how much one variable is likely to change when another changes. The result is a regression equation that can be used to predict values, which is why regression is often done after confirming that a meaningful correlation exists. 

The steps help turn patterns in data into useful insights—while always remembering that a relationship doesn’t automatically mean one thing causes the other. 

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and causation are closely related ideas, but they are not the same; mixing them up can lead to misleading conclusions. Correlation simply means that two variables change together. When one increases or decreases, the other tends to do the same, or the opposite. However, this information on trends does not explain what actually causes this increase or decrease. 

One common issue is the directionality problem. Even when two variables are strongly correlated, it’s often unclear which one is influencing the other. For example, does more screen time lead to poor sleep, or do people who struggle with sleep spend more time on their phones? Correlation alone cannot answer this question. 

Another challenge is the third variable problem, where a hidden factor influences both variables, creating the illusion of a direct relationship. For example, people, when stressed or overworked, may spend more time on their phones late at night and also struggle to sleep well, making it look like screen time alone is the cause when a third factor is driving both. 

Causation, by contrast, means that one variable directly causes a change in another. Establishing this requires careful testing and control to rule out directionality issues and third variables. In short, correlation helps us spot relationships, but understanding directionality and hidden factors is essential when discussing cause and effect. 

Correlational Research vs Experimental Research

The following table highlights the key differences between correlational and experimental research: 

Characteristic	Correlational Research	Experimental Research
Definition	A non-experimental approach that examines the relationship between two or more variables as they naturally occur, without manipulation.	A research method in which one or more variables are deliberately manipulated to observe their effect on other variables.
Benefits	Helps identify patterns and relationships, supports prediction, and is suitable when variables cannot be ethically or practically controlled.	Enables clear cause-and-effect conclusions through controlled and systematic manipulation of variables.
Examples	Studying the relationship between study hours and exam scores.	Testing the impact of a new teaching method on student performance.

Key takeaways

• It involves measuring two or more variables to see whether they change together in any meaningful way. 
• The researcher does not manipulate or control variables; data is collected as it occurs in real-world settings. 
• Statistical measures are used to describe how strong the association is and whether it is positive or negative. 
• The relationship identified may show variables increasing together, moving in opposite directions, or having no clear link at all. 
• Even when a strong association exists, it cannot be used to claim that one variable causes changes in another. 
• Both numerical data and categorical groupings can be analyzed using this approach. 
• It is especially useful for spotting patterns, making predictions, and laying the groundwork for further research. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 23+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster. 

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$25 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed. 

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free! 

References 

1. Thomas, D., & Zubkov, P. (2023). Quantitative research designs. Quantitative Research for Practical Theology, 103-114. 

2. Curtis, E. A., Comiskey, C., & Dempsey, O. (2016). Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Researcher, 23(6).